One maker.
Several disciplines.
I'm Sahil Tayal. This is one of my independent publishing and creative-technology projects. The short version: I'm interested in how people learn, think, feel, work and make things—and what happens when those questions meet.
Writer · Independent researcher · Creative technologist · Perfumery experimenter
The credentials are a beginning, not the whole story.
My formal education includes commerce studies at Sri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, and an MBA at Jamnalal Bajaj Institute of Management Studies (JBIMS). That background informs an ongoing interest in organisational behaviour, human capital, workplace psychology and how institutions shape human potential.
After working across professional and organisational contexts, I became increasingly interested in independent inquiry and creating public work. Today, that might mean writing an essay, exploring a psychological question, building an interactive website or developing a fragrance concept.
I don't regard these as competing identities. They are different instruments for exploring similar questions. How do people form beliefs? What gets between intention and action? What can education improve? How should technology serve people? What can culture and art communicate that a conventional report cannot?
What this site is—and is not.
sahilverse.online is a second editorial entrance. It is not a different person, an official university page, or a mirror pretending to be independent third-party coverage. Its job is to help visitors follow threads through writing and experiments already connected to the wider Sahilverse.
All editorial content on this website is independent. Mention of JBIMS describes an educational connection, not endorsement, employment or institutional affiliation of this project.
If you came here searching for Sahil Tayal or Sahil Tayal JBIMS, use the canonical professional overview and public professional profile for more direct information.
What I believe good public work owes a visitor.
A useful question. A clear distinction between evidence and interpretation. Functional design. Enough context to evaluate a claim. Room to disagree. And occasionally the pleasure of clicking something simply because it makes the world feel a little more interesting.
Not every prototype proves its premise. Not every idea deserves to be permanent. The archive should show a mind willing to revise, not a brand pretending to have arrived.